Legal Opinion

Longstaff v. Tuthill

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Carbon County

Decided December 7, 1987No. 87-0095Published

1Opinion of the Court

LAVELLE, P.J.,

This case raises the perplexing question of whether the court should allow the amendment of the name of a defendant after the statute of limitations has run. Because the effect of plaintiff’s proposed amendment would be to introduce a new and distinct party to the action, we cannot permit the amendment.

FACTS OF THE CASE

Plaintiffs complaint alleges that, through the negligence of defendant, Ray Tuthill, individually and trading as Little Gap Ski Area, she was injured while skiing at Little Gap. Plaintiff described Ray Tuthill in the complaint as an individual and the lawful owner…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Waugh v. Steelton Taxicab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Kerner v. RackmillDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Jacob's Air Conditioning & Heating v. Associated Heating & Air ConditioningSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Cianchetti v. KaylenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Wicker v. EspositoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API