Cripps v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Hardesty, J.:
In this appeal, we revisit our decision in Standley v. Warden, addressing judicial participation in plea negotiations. Because of the potential coercive effect of such participation, we overrule Standley and adopt new standards governing the district courts’ participation in the plea negotiation process. We conclude that these new standards shall apply prospectively only to all future criminal cases to be commenced in the courts below. Applying the holding in Standley to the facts before us, we affirm the judgment of conviction at issue in this appeal.
FACTS
In…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Elksnis v. GilliganDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- United States v. Kenneth R. BruceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Honorable Henry F. Werker, United States District Judge, United States of America v. Harry Santos-FigueroaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Greene v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. NiblackSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Corraspe v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2010
- People v. CrumbColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- Bryan Eagles v. Jeremy Bean, et al.District Court, D. Nevada · 2026
- Candelas (Jose) v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2014
- Kinford v. GarrettDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.