Legal Opinion

Almanza v. Bowen

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 8, 2010No. 63153-5-IPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.

¶1 Joel and Cherae Almanza agreed to buy a home from Jay and Cindy Bowen. The Almanzas decided to back out before the sale closed and sued to recover their earnest money. By statute, prospective buyers who have not received a disclosure statement have the right to rescind their offer. The Bowens did not provide a disclosure statement. They argue the statute does not apply to buyers who rescind for reasons unrelated to the absence of disclosure. We hold that the statute provides a bright-line remedy of rescission. The trial court correctly granted summary judgment to the Almanzas.

¶2 On July…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sheikh v. ChoeWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Aba Sheikh v. ChoeWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Labriola v. Pollard Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Labriola v. Pollard Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Alejandre v. BullWashington Supreme Court · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Renfro v. KaurCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  2. Renfro v. KaurCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  3. Almanza v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  4. T & B Washington, Inc., Dba v. Virginia DullantyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  5. T & B Washington, Inc., dba v. Virginia DullantyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API