People v. Melandrez
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. W. P. James, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGray, P. J.
The defendant was convicted of the crime of grand larceny, and appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
1. The information in appropriate language charged the defendant with the stealing of a horse in the county of Riverside and thereafter feloniously bringing the said horse into the county of Los Angeles. The proof taken at the trial shows that the horse stolen was a mare. The first point urged for reversal is the variance, as to the sex of the animal, between the proof and the information. This question is settled adversely to appellant’s contention in…
2Cited by7 opinions
- State v. BrassfieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
- Edwards v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- People v. LeavensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- People v. RamosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- People v. FayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.