Legal Opinion

Conner v. Hart

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 19, 2001No. A01A0877PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Judge.

Donna Joann Conner sued her business partner, Joseph Hart, for breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, attorney fees, and punitive damages. The case proceeded to trial, and the trial court granted Hart a directed verdict on each of these claims at the close of Conner’s case. Conner appeals, and for reasons that follow, we affirm.

In reviewing the grant or denial of a motion for directed verdict, we apply the “any evidence” test and construe the evidence most favorably to the party opposing the motion. Under this standard, “[a] directed verdict is proper only if there is no conflict in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Atlanta Market Center Management Co. v. McLaneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  2. Tante v. HerringSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  3. ReMax North Atlanta v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  4. Foster v. SikesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  5. Stiefel v. SchickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Griffin v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  2. RITE AID OF GEORGIA, INC. v. PeacockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  3. Willett v. Russell M. Stookey, P.C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  4. Zieve v. HairstonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  5. MCI Communications Services, Inc. v. CMES, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2012

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API