Legal Opinion

Zieve v. Hairston

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 12, 2004No. A03A2262, A03A2263PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Judge.

These consolidated cases arise out of Celento Hairston’s lawsuit against Ronald Zieve and National Hair Transplant Specialists, Inc. for their unauthorized televising of Hairston’s before and after hair replacement photographs. Following a jury verdict in favor of Hairston in the total amount of $365,000, 1 defendants appealed the trial court’s order denying their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Hairston filed a cross-appeal of the trial court’s order granting partial summary judgment to Zieve before trial and the trial court’s partial grant of a directed…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Cabaniss v. HipsleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  2. Hamilton v. Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & MurphySupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  3. St. Paul Mercury Insurance v. MeeksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  4. Hamilton v. Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & MurphyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  5. MDC BLACKSHEAR, LLC v. LittellSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Perry Golf Course Development, LLC v. HOUS. AUTH. OF CITY OF ATLANTACourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  2. Johnson v. GAPVT Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  3. ROCKDALE HOSPITAL, LLC v. EVANS (Two Cases)Supreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  4. Wheat Trust v. SparksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  5. Dep't of Labor v. McconnellSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API