Legal Opinion

Stiefel v. Schick

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 3, 1990No. S90A0879PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Justice.

The plaintiffs-appellants, Stiefel and Freimark, and the defendants-appellees, Schick and Forman, were business partners. Appellants sued the appellees for a declaration that each appellant owned part of the partnership. Appellant Stiefel also filed a claim for fraud. Appellees counterclaimed, inter alia, for compensatory damages for fraud and “punitive” (exemplary) damages. After the trial court directed a verdict against Stiefel on his claim for fraud, the jury returned a verdict finding that appellants had no interest in the partnership. The jury also awarded appellees one…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  2. Glynn County Federal Employees Credit Union v. PeaglerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  3. WMH, INC. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Holmes v. GrubmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  2. Condrey v. Suntrust Bank of GACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  3. Optimum Technologies, Inc. v. Henkel Consumer Adhesives, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  4. Morrison v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  5. Holmes v. GrubmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API