Legal Opinion
PlayUp, Inc. v. Mintas
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided May 20, 2022No. 2:21-cv-02129Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 PLAYUP, INC., Case No. 2:21-cv-02129-GMN-NJK 8 Plaintiff(s), Order 9 v. [Docket Nos. 83, 84, 115] 10 DR. LAILA MINTAS, 11 Defendant(s). 12 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion to quash and motion for protective order 13 related to a subpoena to Sportradar US. Docket Nos. 83, 84. Plaintiff filed a response in 14 opposition. Docket No. 109. Defendant filed a reply. Docket No. 111.1,2 The motions are 15 properly decided without a hearing. See Local Rule 78-1. For the reasons discussed more fully 16 below, the motions to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Crawford-El v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Hallett v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Harold D. Blankenship, an Individual v. The Hearst Corporation, a Corporation, William H. Myers, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Rivera v. Nibco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Larry Efosa BAZUAYE, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.