Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Jonas

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 1, 2017No. 15-1560Published

1ConcurrenceWaterman, Justice

I concur with the result of the majority opinion affirming Stephen Jonas’s conviction for second-degree murder. I write separately because I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the district court abused its discretion by denying Jonas’s motion to disqualify the juror for cause. In my view, the district court acted within its discretion. I would affirm Jonas’s conviction on that basis and leave the rest of the majority’s discussion for another case and another day.

A prospective juror must be dismissed for cause when he or she has “formed or expressed such an opinion as to the guilt or…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Thompson v. KeohaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Morgan v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Patton v. YountSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Skilling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Alfred R. Dyer v. Arthur Calderon, Warden, of California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API