Legal Opinion

United Fire & Casualty Co. v. Kleppe

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1993No. 91-1231-FTPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam A. Bablitch, J.

Gayle Kleppe and Beau Wold (collectively Kleppe) seek review of a court of appeals' decision which held that the Kleppe's monetary recovery from their uninsured motorist (UM) coverage could be reduced by sums paid or payable to the Kleppes from Gayle Kleppe's employer's worker's compensation carrier. The United Fire and Casualty Company's (UF& C's) insurance policy issued to Kleppe contained a reducing clause to this effect which the company sought to enforce. Kleppe argues that this court's prior case law mandates that clauses seeking to reduce compensation available to an insured under a UM…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. HutnikWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Nicholson v. Home Insurance Companies, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Berna-Mork v. JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Rudolph v. Indian Hills Estates, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Wisconsin Education Ass'n Council v. Wisconsin State Elections BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hull v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Teschendorf v. State Farm Ins. CompaniesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Kuhn v. Allstate InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Berna-Mork v. JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Allstate Insurance Co. v. GiffordCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API