Legal Opinion

Rudolph v. Indian Hills Estates, Inc.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1975No. 444PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.

The question raised on this appeal is whether the declaratory judgments statute 1 may be properly used to adjudicate plaintiffs’ claim of right to (1) maintain a tree house, (2) construct a swimming pool, and (3) seek dissolution of defendant corporation.

The test. For the proper maintenance of a declaratory judgment action, four conditions precedent must be met by the party bringing such action. 2 They are as follows:(1) Justiciable Controversy. “ . There must exist a justiciable controversy — that is to say, a controversy in which a claim of right is asserted against one who has an interest…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Washington-Detroit Theatre Co. v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. State ex rel. La Follette v. DammannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Miller v. CurrieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Waukesha Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. BairdWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Selective Insurance v. Michigan Mutual Liability InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lister v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin SystemWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State Ex Rel. Lynch v. ContaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Tooley v. O'CONNELLWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. United Fire & Casualty Co. v. KleppeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Helgeland v. Wisconsin MunicipalitiesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API