Rudolph v. Indian Hills Estates, Inc.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.
The question raised on this appeal is whether the declaratory judgments statute 1 may be properly used to adjudicate plaintiffs’ claim of right to (1) maintain a tree house, (2) construct a swimming pool, and (3) seek dissolution of defendant corporation.
The test. For the proper maintenance of a declaratory judgment action, four conditions precedent must be met by the party bringing such action. 2 They are as follows:(1) Justiciable Controversy. “ . There must exist a justiciable controversy — that is to say, a controversy in which a claim of right is asserted against one who has an interest…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Washington-Detroit Theatre Co. v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- State ex rel. La Follette v. DammannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- Miller v. CurrieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Waukesha Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. BairdWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Selective Insurance v. Michigan Mutual Liability InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lister v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin SystemWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Lynch v. ContaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Tooley v. O'CONNELLWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- United Fire & Casualty Co. v. KleppeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
- Helgeland v. Wisconsin MunicipalitiesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.