Legal Opinion

Liptak v. Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 8, 1957PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

44 N.J. Super. 140 (1957)

129 A.2d 890

ANNA LIPTAK, APPELLANT,

v.

DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL, DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued February 18, 1957.

Decided March 8, 1957.

Before Judges CLAPP, JAYNE and FRANCIS.

Mr. Charles L. Bertini argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Samuel B. Helfand, Deputy Attorney-General, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Grover C. Richman, Jr., Attorney-General, attorney).

The opinion of the court was delivered by FRANCIS, J.A.D.

In a self-initiated proceeding the Director…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Greenspan v. Division of Alcoholic Beverage ControlSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  2. Brush v. HockSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1948

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fanwood v. RoccoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  2. Brunson v. Rutherford Lodge Number 547New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  3. Cavallaro 556 Valley Street Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverage ControlNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API