Legal Opinion

Fanwood v. Rocco

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 26, 1960PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

59 N.J. Super. 306 (1960)

157 A.2d 712

BOROUGH OF FANWOOD, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, APPELLANT,

v.

ANTONIO ROCCO AND DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL, RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 27, 1959.

Decided January 26, 1960.

Before Judges PRICE, GAULKIN and SULLIVAN.

Mr. Max L. Rosenstein argued the cause for the appellant (Mr. William M. Beard, attorney).

Mr. Samuel B. Helfand, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for the Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control (Mr. David D. Furman, Attorney General, attorney).

Mr. George F. Hetfield argued the cause for…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Barry v. O'ConnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Ward v. ScottSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  3. Hager v. WeberSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  4. Graham & the Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Grundlehner v. DanglerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  2. Security Corp. v. Lehman Associates, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  3. Lutz v. Township of GloucesterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  4. Kopera v. West Orange Bd. of EducationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  5. Cooley's, Etc., Found. v. Legalized Games, Etc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API