Legal Opinion

People v. Martin

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided November 1, 1999No. 98CA0764PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge BRIGGS.

Defendant, Vance E. Martin, appeals the trial court’s order denying his Crim. P. 35(c) motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

Pursuant to a plea agreement, defendant entered a plea of guilty to one count of sexual assault on a child by one in a position of trust. Defendant’s admission was for an act committed between July 1 and July 31, 1993.

In exchange for the guilty plea, the prosecutor dismissed all remaining charges. The plea agreement also provided that defendant would not be sentenced in the aggravated range or pursuant to the Sex Offenders Act, § 16-13-201,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. People v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. People v. PozoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  3. A.B. Hirschfeld Press, Inc. v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  4. Bynum v. KautzkySupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  5. Duran v. PriceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Martin v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  2. People v. GreenColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. People v. JohnsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. People v. WirschingColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. People v. CooperColorado Court of Appeals · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API