Legal Opinion

Guerra v. Sentry Insurance

Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)

Decided September 19, 1996No. 11-95-329-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKENSON, Justice.

The trial court granted the insurance company’s motion for summary judgment that there was no coverage under the policy in question. We affirm.

The question on appeal is whether the insurance policy provided liability coverage on an “additional vehicle” which was ae-. quired by the policyholder (and which was involved in an accident within 30 days of its acquisition) when notice was not given to the insurance company within 30 days after the policyholder became the owner of the automobile. We hold that the trial court was correct in finding that the insurance policy did not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Farm & City Insurance Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
  2. Ga. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Criterion Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  3. Auto-Owners Insurance v. WinterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Pride v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  5. Acela Garrote v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Colonial Penn Insurance v. GuzorekIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Perrotta v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API