Acela Garrote v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RONEY, Circuit Judge:
Relying on a single Florida case, Mrs. Acela Garrote asserts that contrary to the decision of the District Court, her automobile liability insurance policy should cover an accident she had while driving an automobile which was acquired after the policy was issued.
The crucial decision in the case is whether the language of the policy requiring notice to the company within 30 days of the acquisition of a new automobile is ambiguous and must be construed against the company under the holding of Beasley v. Wolf, 151 So.2d 679 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1963). Deciding that the District…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Beasley v. WolfDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
- Pennsylvania Thresh. & F. Mut. Cas. Ins. Co. v. TraisterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- Coleman v. Atlantic National Insurance CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
3Cited by8 opinions
- Stockberger v. Meridian Mutual InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Farm & City Insurance Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
- Rabatie v. US SEC. Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. v. BakerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Guerra v. Sentry Insurance, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.