Danielle Ex Rel. Komando v. Adriazola
District Court, S.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANTS ADRIAZOLA, FYFFE, WORSLEYAND KEARNEY
HUCK, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Second-Amended Motion to Dismiss Defendants Adriazola, Fyffe, Worsley, and Kearny, filed on June 24, 2003 [DE # 6] (“Second-Amended Motion”). These Defendants move to dismiss on several grounds, including failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, qualified immunity, and Plaintiff’s lack of capacity to sue. Plaintiff contests each of these arguments, contending the Complaint sufficiently states a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mcreynolds v. Alabama Department of Youth ServicesDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2006
- McReynolds Ex Rel. DM v. ALA. DEPT. YOUTH SERV.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2006