Legal Opinion

State v. Bergstrom

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 2007No. 78355-1PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1

Fairhurst, J.

Gordon Bergstrom appeals his sentence for first degree unlawful possession of a firearm, arguing that the sentencing court incorrectly placed the burden on him to prove that his prior convictions encompassed the same criminal conduct. At his sentencing hearing, Bergstrom, although represented by counsel, argued pro se that some of the prior crimes included in his criminal history involved same criminal conduct, in essence disputing the standard sentence range presented in both the State and defense presentence reports.1 The sentencing court refused to deviate from that standard…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. FordWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. In re the Personal Restraint of GoodwinWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. CrossWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. CrossWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. NitschCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. State v. HunleyWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. MendozaWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. MendozaWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API