Legal Opinion
Mendenhall v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided March 28, 1990No. 73-89CPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ANDEWELT, Judge.
In this government contract action, plaintiff, David L. Mendenhall, appearing pro se, seeks $85,000 in damages relating to six contracts he entered with the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) covering the harvesting of timber in specified areas of the Clearwater National Forest in Kamiah, Idaho. This action is presently before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to RUSCC 12(b)(1). Defendant alleges that plaintiff has not satisfied the jurisdictional requirements for suit in this court under the Contract Disputes Act…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Contract Cleaning Maintenance, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Paragon Energy Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Northern Helex Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- William Green Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
- Gerald L. Naekel v. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Lucas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
- Sun Eagle Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Cincinnati Electronics Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Pueblo of Zuni v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.