Legal Opinion
Wood Cty. Dog Warden v. Lathrop
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided February 18, 2022No. WD-21-059PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as Wood Cty. Dog Warden v. Lathrop,
2022-Ohio-480.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WOOD COUNTY Ashley Lathrop Court of Appeals No. WD-21-059 Appellee Trial Court No. CVH1901424 v. Wood County Dog Warden DECISION AND JUDGMENT Appellant Decided: February 18, 2022 ***** James A. Grandowicz, for appellee. Paul A. Dobson, Wood County Prosecuting Attorney, and David T. Harold, Chief Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, and Joyce C. Nowak, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. ***** PIETRYKOWSKI, J. {¶ 1} Following our July 23, 2021 reversal and remand, Lathrop v.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Eastley v. VolkmanOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- In re Estate of HaynesOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Ramsey v. KingOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
- Spangler v. Stark Cty. Dog WardenOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Two Brothers Market, L.L.C. v. SinghOhio Court of Appeals · 2025