Burris v. Krooss
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
WALTER, Justice.
Harold Burris filed suit against Eva Krooss seeking damages for the cutting of certain shade trees on his property. Burris alleged Krooss negligently failed to ascertain the location of the boundary line dividing her property from Burris’ property. After the jury’s verdict favoring Burris, the court granted Krooss’ motion for judgment non obstante veredicto and Burris has appealed. We reverse and render.
*877In October, 1975, John Lerette asked Krooss for permission to cut down some trees on her property. Lerette planned to sell the trees as firewood. Krooss authorized Lerette to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Douglass v. Panama, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1974
- Cummer-Graham Co. v. MaddoxTexas Supreme Court · 1956
- Grell v. LumsdenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
- Ripy v. LessCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Hamilton v. FantCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Schievink v. Wendylou Ranch, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2007
- Village Place LTD and Bob Yari v. VP Shopping, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013
- Wiersum v. HarderAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Miloszar v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Jochum Schievink and Vicki Schievink v. Wendylou Ranch, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.