Legal Opinion

Miloszar v. Gonzalez

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 25, 1981No. 1809PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YOUNG, Justice.

This suit arose from a land-clearing contractor’s removal of trees and other vegetation from land without the landowner’s consent. Michael Miloszar, the landowner, sued Abel Gonzalez, individually and d/b/a G & T Construction Company, for damages resulting from Gonzalez’s trespass on Milos-zar’s land. Trial was to the court without a jury. The trial court in its judgment awarded the plaintiff the total amount of damages of $1,500.00 as the cost of removing cleared materials from plaintiff’s land together with the cost of regrading and releveling the cleared portion of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Ray v. Farmers' State Bank of HartTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Copenhaver v. BerrymanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. Lucas v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  5. Cummer-Graham Co. v. MaddoxTexas Supreme Court · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Porras v. CraigTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Worthington v. RobertsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  3. Lamar County Electric Cooperative Ass'n v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  4. Enbridge Pipelines (East Texas) L.P. v. Gilbert Wheeler, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2015
  5. Porras v. CraigTexas Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API