Legal Opinion

Gimbel Bros. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 21, 1934No. 3775; No. 3776Published

1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, Judge

In these consolidated cases the respective importers have appealed from a judgment rendered by the United States Customs Court overruling protests against the classification and duty assessment, by the Collector of Customs, of certain articles imported under the Tariff Act of 1922, which were invoiced as “sponge rubber mats."

The classification by the collector was under the provision for “all other floor coverings not specially provided for”, in paragraph 1022 of the Tariff Act of 1922, duty being assessed at 40 per centum ad valorem.

Appellants claim that the -merchandise is dutiable at 25…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Kny-Scheerer Corp. of AmericaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API