Legal Opinion

Humphries v. Carter

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1938PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cook

The defendant, county court clerk of Shelby county, required complainant to pay the privilege tax imposed on each person operating a nursery, or operating a greenhouse by article 2, section 1, item 40, chapter 108, the Eevenue Law of 1937. The tax was paid under protest, and the bill filed to recover under Code, section 1790. The chancellor sustained defendant’s demurrer, and complainant appealed.

It is insisted that the decree of the chancellor should be reversed (1) because the act does not extend to complainant’s use of her land for the production of plants and shrubs; (2) a contrary…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blake v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
  2. Railroad v. HarrisTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Bank of Commerce & Trust Co. v. SenterTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Foster & Creighton Co. v. GrahamTennessee Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Kurth v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Steven Waters v. Reagan Farr, Commissioner of Revenue for the State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  2. International Harvester Company v. CarrTennessee Supreme Court · 1971
  3. P. Lorillard Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Mowery v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Buchanan v. CarsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API