People ex rel. Attorney General v. River Raisin & Lake Erie Railroad
Michigan Supreme Court
Information in tbe nature of a quo warranto. The case was brought to a hearing on demurrer to the replication, and the pleadings are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Campbell J. :
The Attorney General filed an information, charging defendants with usurping the following liberties, privileges and franchises, viz: “That of becoming proprietors of a bank or fund, for the purpose of issuing notes, and transacting other business which incorporated banks may and do transact, by virtue of their respective acts of incorporation, and also that of actually issuing notes and carrying on banking operations, and other monied transactions, which are usually performed by incorporated banks, and which they alone have a right to do and inquiring by what warrant they claim…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People ex rel. Attorney General v. Utica InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1818
- People v. PresidentNew York Supreme Court · 1826
- People v. PresidentNew York Supreme Court · 1826
- Utica Insurance v. ScottCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1826
- Taylor v. MarshalNew York Supreme Court · 1817
3Cited by9 opinions
- People ex rel. Drake v. MahaneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
- State ex inf. Hadley v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- Wells, Fargo & Co. v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.United States Circuit Court · 1884
- Chapman v. Colby Bros.Michigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Lockhard v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.