Legal Opinion

Chapman v. Colby Bros.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1881PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Hillsdale. Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Defendant in error, claiming to be a Vermont private corporation, recovered judgment against Chapman in the Hillsdale circuit court for money advanced to him, and not repaid either in cash or in real estate, as it is claimed he was to repay it. The declaration described the plaintiffs below as incorporated under a statute referred to, and contained the common counts, and no special count.

The facts out of which the transaction sued on arose, so far as now material, were as follows: In October, 18Y1, an agreement was executed in Beading, Hillsdale county, by a number of parties, including…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Thompson v. WatersMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Kermott v. AyerMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  3. President of the Bank v. NilesMichigan Supreme Court · 1844
  4. People ex rel. Attorney General v. River Raisin & Lake Erie RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
  5. People ex rel. Detroit Fire & Marine Insurance v. Judge of the Saginaw Circuit CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1871

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sutton v. BeckwithMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Daniels v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. French v. DonohueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  4. Eastern Products Corporations v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & R.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Besemer v. Estate of FjerstadMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API