Legal Opinion

O'Neill v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1918No. 3134PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from District Court of Salt Lake County, Third District; Hon Harold M. Stephens, Judge. Action by Selma O’Neill against the Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York and the Utah Savings & Trust Company. Judgment dismissing the action. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGideon, J.

In this opinion the respondent Mutual Life Insurance Company will be designated “Insurance Company,” and the respondent Utah Savings & Trust Company as “Trust Company.”

To appellant’s amended complaint the defendant Insurance Company filed a general and a special demurrer, and also a motion to strike out certain parts thereof. The defendant *594Trust Company intei'posed a general demurrer. Both the general and special demurrers of the Insurance Company and the general demurrer of the Trust Company were held to be good, and, the plaintiff refusing to amend after leave given, judgment was entered…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Swan v. TalbotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Fitzgerald ex rel. Stockholders of the Fitzgerald & Mallory Construction Co. v. Fitzgerald & Mallory Construction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Sauter v. LeveridgeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  4. Ware, Murphy & Co. v. Morgan & DuncanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  5. Simpson & Co. v. DallSupreme Court of the United States · 1866

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. MichelIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Cole v. ParkerUtah Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Kinsman v. Utah Gas & Coke Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Turner v. DOMESTIC INVESTMENT AND LOAN CORPORATIONSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
  5. Cole v. ParkerUtah Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API