Ulstad v. Brenny

OPINION

KLAPHAKE, Judge.

Appellant Holly Ulstad was employed by a temporary agency to work at respondent Charles Brenny’s insurance office, where she was injured in a fall. Although she received workers’ compensation through the temporary agency, she brought this *769negligence action against Brenny. Applying the loaned servant doctrine, the district court determined that the temporary agency was Ulstad’s general employer, that Brenny was her special employer, and that her exclusive remedy was under workers’ compensation law. Ulstad contends that the loaned servant doctrine does not preclude a…