Legal Opinion
United Food & Commercial Workers International Union Local 400 v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided August 22, 2000No. 98-1422 & 98-1479PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GARLAND.
GARLAND, Circuit Judge:
The United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, Local 400, AFL-CIO (“the Union”) filed unfair labor practice charges with the National Labor Relations Board in connection with an organizing drive at Farm Fresh grocery stores in the Tidewater area of Virginia. 1 The Board determined that Farm Fresh had committed a number of unfair labor practices, and the company has not petitioned for review of that determination. The Board declined, however, to find unfair labor practices in two circumstances as to which…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. ReichSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lechmere, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Carstensen v. Chrisland Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ark Las Vegas Restaurant Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Roundy's Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Venetian Casino Resort, L.L.C. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Glendale Associates, Ltd. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Glendale Associates, Ltd. Glendale II Associates Limited Partnership Donahue Schriber v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Glendale Associates, Ltd. Glendale II Associates Limited Partnership Donahue SchriberCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003