Legal Opinion

Acker v. Cecil National Bank

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 14, 1932No. [No. 75, October Term, 1931.]PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBond, C. J.

The question in this case and the next is whether the power or warrant in a promissory note authorizing an attorney to confess judgment for the amount due can be exe-r cised, and the judgment confessed and entered, under that authority, when the debtor has previously become insane. The question assumes that the maker was competent at the time of the making' of the note; insanity at that time would go to invalidate the note and the power in it from the beginning. It is a question of the applicability of the rule that incompetency of a principal or donor of a power revokes authority or power…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Attrill v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1882
  2. Howard v. StreetCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
  3. Hill v. IglehartCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
  4. McCaul v. ThayerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Johnson v. National Bank of MattoonIllinois Supreme Court · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Liberto v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
  2. Piper v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  3. Lee v. O'BrienCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  4. Acker v. National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API