Legal Opinion
Kupchinsky v. Vacuum Oil Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 3, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.
The two actions were tried together, resulting in separate judgments for the respective plaintiffs. Both actions arose in an accident occurring when there was a collision between the trucks of the defendants. Riding in the truck of defendant Lesser were two children. One, Gloria Kupchinsky, about three years of age, was killed. The other, Raymond Kupchinsky, eleven years of age at the time, was injured. Defendant Vacuum Oil Company only has appealed. For the purpose of this appeal the negligence of the appellant is conceded. The verdict determined that defendant Lesser also was negligent.
The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hartfield v. RoperNew York Supreme Court · 1839
- Kunz v. . City of TroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- McGarry v. . LoomisNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Morrison v. . Erie Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Lannen v. . the Albany Gas-Light Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Spaulding v. MineahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Lindner v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1966
- Messick v. Delaware Electric Power Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1934
- Spaulding v. MineahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933