Legal Opinion

In re Keokuk

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided April 8, 2019No. CASE NO. 17-30370PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gregory R. Schaaf, Bankruptcy Judge

The Debtor seeks confirmation of her Second Amended Chapter 13 Plan. [ECF No. 99.] 21st Mortgage Corporation, a secured creditor, argues that the Second Amended Plan does not comply with 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(5)(B).1 [ECF No. 107.] The Objection is sustained, and confirmation of the Second Amended Plan is denied for the reasons set out herein.

I. FACTS.

The Debtor filed for chapter 13 relief and scheduled real property at 1392 Baxter Ridge Road, Lawrenceburg, Kentucky ("Real Estate"), and a 2007 Giles mobile home located thereon ("Mobile Home"). [ECF No. 18.]…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Associates Commercial Corp. v. RashSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Triad International Maintenance Corp. v. Southern Air Transport, Inc. (In Re Southern Air Transport, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  5. In Re Sharon E. Kerwin, Debtor, First Brandon National Bank v. Sharon E. Kerwin, Jan M. Sensenich, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moore v. Georgia United Credit UnionDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2021
  2. Trenda F MooreUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 2020
  3. Willet Walter ThomasUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API