Legal Opinion

Framingham Union Hospital, Inc. v. Travelers Insurance

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided September 27, 1989No. Civ. A. 89-0209-SPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND FOR SANCTIONS

SKINNER, District Judge.

The plaintiffs Framingham Union Hospital, Inc., (“the Hospital”), its employee benefit plan (“the Plan”), and the Plan trustees, James Kerrigan, Ross Markello and Roger Peloquin (“the Trustees”), allege that defendant insurers and others violated ERISA prohibitions against self-dealing by fiduciaries, the federal racketeering statute, and various Massachusetts state laws, by virtue of their role in the investment of Plan assets in certain insurance policies. This memorandum addresses the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Custer v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  2. In Re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative & ERISADistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2003
  3. End of the Road Trust Ex Rel. Fruehauf Trailer Corp. v. Terex Corp. (In Re Fruehauf Trailer Corp.)District Court, D. Delaware · 2000
  4. Torres v. Bella Vista Hospital, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2007
  5. Miara v. First Allmerica Financial Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API