Legal Opinion

Stanford v. Van Skiver

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 13, 1978PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order denying motion to open default judgment against third-party defendant Patterson unanimously modified, with costs to appellant, motion granted in accordance with memorandum and, as modified, affirmed. Denman, J., not participating. Memorandum: Plaintiffs Stanfords brought action against defendant Van Skiver for breach of warranty of title to real estate, on the ground that defendant owned less than four acres of the six-acre parcel described in his deed to plaintiffs, and they asked for damages in the sum of $3,150 plus interest and costs. Van Skiver answered; and he then brought a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Regan v. LanzeNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Avalon Construction Corp. v. Kirch Holding Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Sivakoff v. SivakoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  4. Regan v. LanzeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  5. Tucker V. ToiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Delgado v. HowellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  2. Mazie v. MazieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API