Legal Opinion

Whitley v. Canton City School District Board of Education

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1988No. 87-1779PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtH. Brown, J.

Our decision in this case turns upon interpretation of the collective bargaining agreement under which the parties are bound. The board has asserted three grounds in support of summary judgment: (1) the RIF provisions in the agreement only apply to areas in which the employee was certified at the time of layoff, (2) Whitley was not certified in elementary education at the time of hiring for the 1984-1985 school year, and (3) Whitley did not have “reasonable qualifications and experience equal” to the teachers hired over him. We find that the asserted grounds do not support summary judgment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rose v. N.Y. Life Ins. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Jacot v. SecrestOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Stow Teachers Ass'n v. Stow Board of EducationOhio Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Chavis v. Sycamore City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Keatley v. Mercer County Board of EducationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State ex rel. Chavis v. Sycamore City School Dist. Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Rollins v. Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Adams v. Lci International Telecom Corp., Unpublished Decision (7-20-2000)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API