Legal Opinion

Stow Teachers Ass'n v. Stow Board of Education

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 17, 1981No. 9985PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

Appellant assigns error to the trial court’s declaration of rights of the parties contestant under Article IX of the Stow City Schools Master Contract. We affirm.

At the end of the 1979-80 academic year a number of teachers voluntarily terminated their services with the Stow City System. The Stow Board of Education failed to hire replacements for all of those who left with the result that four fewer teachers were employed for the 1980-81 school year than were employed in 1979-80.

Appellant contended that such a disparity in teaching positions constituted a “reduction in force” as that phrase is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rylke v. Portage Area School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Madison County. Board of Education v. WigleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1972

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Whitley v. Canton City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Valdez v. CantorColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Cuyahoga Falls Education Ass'n v. Cuyahoga Falls City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API