Legal Opinion
Harnau v. Haight
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided October 15, 1920No. Calendar No. 28,939PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Bill by Peter Harnau against Louis P. Haight and others in the nature of'a judgment creditor’s bill. A decree was entered in the Supreme Court for plaintiff. On motion to set aside a sale of corporate stock in violation of said decree.
1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.
By the decree of the court below in this case a receiver was appointed to take over the property of the defendant corporation, the Muskegon. Knitting Mills, and to make use of the receipts and assets thereof for the following purposes, and in the order given:
*67“1. To take care of the running expenses of the plant.
“2. To pay all legitimate expenses of the receivership.
“3. To pay all claims and accounts secured and unsecured which have accrued subsequently to the incorporation of the Muskegon Knitting Mills, and now held by persons or parties who are not now, nor ever have been holders of any of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Harnau v. HaightMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Newbould v. StewartMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
- Steele v. BlissMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Bancroft v. Board of Regents of UniversityMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tiedman v. TiedmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
- Michigamme Oil Co. v. Huron Valley Building & Savings Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Boyle v. BergMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
- Miskinis v. BementMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
- Harnau v. Muskegon Knitting MillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.