Legal Opinion

Miskinis v. Bement

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1949No. Docket No. 66, Calendar No. 44,477PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

In this foreclosure of a real estate mortgage the only issue presented is this: During what period of time should plaintiffs be allowed to recover interest on a sum of money found to be due on the mortgage loan? Plaintiffs, who are appellants, claim they are entitled to recover interest from May 18,1942, but the trial court allowed interest at 5 per cent, per annum only from the date decree was entered herein, October 25, 1948. There is no controversy about the unpaid principal amount of the mortgage loan — $16,238.35. Much of the factual background of the instant case appears in our opinion…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Michigamme Oil Co. v. Huron Valley Building & Savings Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Harnau v. HaightMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Miskinis v. BementMichigan Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tiedman v. TiedmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Johnson v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  3. People v. BattenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Nemes v. SmithMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Johnson v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API