Miskinis v. Bement
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.
In this foreclosure of a real estate mortgage the only issue presented is this: During what period of time should plaintiffs be allowed to recover interest on a sum of money found to be due on the mortgage loan? Plaintiffs, who are appellants, claim they are entitled to recover interest from May 18,1942, but the trial court allowed interest at 5 per cent, per annum only from the date decree was entered herein, October 25, 1948. There is no controversy about the unpaid principal amount of the mortgage loan — $16,238.35. Much of the factual background of the instant case appears in our opinion…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Michigamme Oil Co. v. Huron Valley Building & Savings Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Harnau v. HaightMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Miskinis v. BementMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tiedman v. TiedmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
- Johnson v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. BattenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
- Nemes v. SmithMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Johnson v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1988