Legal Opinion

United States v. Lot of Wine At 1914 Daly Ave.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 3, 1928PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THACHER, District Judge.

It being stipulated that the search was unlawful, seizure of the res necessarily falls, and this entire proceeding, together with the right to hold the res, falls with it. U. S. v. Specified Quantities of Intoxicating Liquors *496(C. C. A.) 7 F.(2d) 835. That part of section 33 of title 2 of the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA § 50), which imposes upon one who possesses liquor in his home the burden of proving “in any action concerning the same” the legality of his possession, can have no application here, because in legal effect and within the meaning of the statute…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Specified Quantities of Intoxicating LiquorsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  2. United States v. A Quantity of Intoxicating LiquorsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Phoenix Cereal Beverage Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  2. United States v. Two Soaking Units & Various Other ArticlesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1930
  3. United States v. 673 Cases of Distilled Spirits & WinesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1946
  4. In Re Phoenix Cereal Beverage Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  5. The Elizabeth S.District Court, E.D. New York · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API