Legal Opinion
Forcelli v. Smith
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided August 25, 2020No. 0:20-cv-00699Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA VANESSA FORCELLI, Civil No. 20-699 (JRT/HB) Petitioner, v. FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER FOR JUDGMENT TIMOTHY CHARLES SMITH, Respondent. Kendal K. O’Keefe and Scott M. Rodman, ARNOLD, RODMAN, & KRETCHMER PLLC, 2626 East 82nd Street, Suite 355, Bloomington, MN 55122, for petitioner. Allison Maxim, MAXIM SMITH FAMILY LAW PLLC, 333 Grand Avenue, Suite 201, Saint Paul, MN 55102, for respondent. Petitioner, Vanessa Forcelli brings this action against Respondent, Timothy Charles Smith pursuant to the Hague Convention, 19 I.L.M.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Emanuel Friedrich v. Jeana Michele Friedrich, David Harper and Shirley HarperCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- In Re: The Application Of, Arnon Mozes v. Michal MozesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Monasky v. TaglieriSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
- Henry G. Baxter v. Jody Amanda BaxterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Bjorn Michael Rydder v. Susan Marie RydderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.