Legal Opinion
Metropolitan Area Housing Alliance v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 29, 1976No. 75 C 3023PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
MARSHALL, District Judge.
The Metropolitan Area Housing Alliance (MAHA) and five individual plaintiffs filed the instant class action for declaratory and injunctive relief against the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Carla Hills, Secretary of HUD, and John L. Waner, Director of the Chicago Area HUD office, seeking a declaration and concomitant injunctive order that HUD’s “vacancy requirement,” 24 C.F.R. § 203.381 (1975), as enforced and administered, violates various provisions of the National Housing Acts, the fifth amendment to the Constitution, the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Snyder v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Zahn v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Norwalk Core v. Norwalk Redevelopment AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- United States Department of Agriculture v. MurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Clay v. American Tobacco Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1999
- Orantes-Hernandez v. SmithDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1982
- Buycks-Roberson v. Citibank Federal Savings BankDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
- Hagen v. City of WinnemuccaDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1985
- Coleman v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2004
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.