Legal Opinion
Andrews-Clarke v. Travelers Insurance
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided October 30, 1997No. Civil Action 97-10191-WGYPublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
YOUNG, District Judge.
Surveys show many people think the insurance industry’s drive to cut costs has reduced dramatically the overall quality of health care, limiting not only their access to the best doctors and hospitals but also putting such time and financial strain on physicians that they can’t possibly provide first-rate treatment.... 1 Hospital officials acknowledged that the cuts on hospital budgets have been steep and swift, occurring mostly because health insurers have scaled back the amount they reimburse hospitals to care for patients. As a result, hospitals are under…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Danca v. Private Health Care Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Doe v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Lirette v. Shiva Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
- Andrews-Clarke v. Lucent Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- United States v. KandirakisDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.