Legal Opinion

State v. Pitt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 19, 1958No. 218PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

For the benefit of law enforcement officers and the profession, the bill of indictment is set out in full because of the accuracy with which it charges an offense under G. S. 18-48. The plea of not guilty placed upon the State the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt all essential elements of the offense: (1) Possession; (2) the Federal or State tax had not been paid, G. S. 18-48; (3) alcoholic content exceeding 14 per cent by volume, G. S. 18-60. The defendant contends the State’s evidence is insuffiicent to prove any of these essentials and that a verdict of not guilty should have…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. . WallaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  2. State v. MerrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. State v. StevensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. State v. MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. State v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  4. State v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. State v. BlountCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API