State Ex Rel. Cobey v. Simpson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WHICHARD, Justice.
The issue is whether defendant must remove fill material which she caused to be deposited in coastal wetlands, a retaining wall and an addition to an existing bulkhead containing the fill material, which she also caused to be constructed in violation of the Coastal Area Management Act of 1974 (“CAMA”), N.C.G.S. §§ 113A-100 to -128 (1989 & Supp. 1992), and the Dredge and Fill Act of 1969 (“DFA”), N.C.G.S. § 113-229 (1990). The trial court ordered removal of only sixty feet of the upper level of the retaining wall and excavation of the adjacent fill dirt back therefrom at an…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Burgess v. Your House of Raleigh, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- Adams v. North Carolina Department of Natural & Economic ResourcesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Childers v. Parker's, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Campbell v. First Baptist Church of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Brooks v. McWhirter Grading Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- State v. McGradySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- Ray v. North Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
- Smith Chapel Baptist Church v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
- Rhyne v. K-Mart Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.