Legal Opinion

Mitler v. Friedeberg

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1961PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.

In the state of the pleadings remaining after motions at Special Term, this is an action at law to recover damages for breach of contract. The case was tried before the court without a jury. Many days were occupied in the presentation of the conflicting evidence. Numerous exhibits were offered and many were received. After the close of the trial, there were submitted to me for individual disposition 194 separately numbered proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law — many including in essence, although unnumbered, subdivisions of factual facets and legal logistics. A number of briefs on…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Reno v. . BullNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Adams v. . GilligNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Paisley v. LucasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  4. Lorillard v. . ClydeNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  5. Loch Sheldrake Associates, Inc. v. EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 1954

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Yonofsky v. WernickDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
  2. Ketcham v. Hall Syndicate, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Allen Chase and Company v. White, Weld & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
  4. Flammia v. Mite CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1975
  5. Robinson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1965

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API