Legal Opinion

Matthews v. Calhoun

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1937No. 26619. Department OnePublished

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

A motion to strike the statement of facts and dismiss the appeal made by respondents in their answering brief, on the ground that the statement of facts was not served until ninety-five days after the entry of the decree and not filed until ninety-eight days after the entry of the decree, was confessed by appellants in their reply brief and in oral argument.

Therefore, the statement of facts must be stricken.

Appellants contend, however, that there are exhibits and other material reproduced in the brief of respondents constituting admissions so that they may be considered by this court on this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McGuirk v. GazzamWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Spencer v. PattonWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  3. White v. MillionWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Brady v. Frigidaire Sales CorporationWashington Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API