Legal Opinion
Augustine v. Board of Police Pension Fund Commissioners
Washington Supreme Court
Decided May 14, 1954No. 32551PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.
— Chapter 41.20, RCW, establishes a system of police relief and pensions in cities of the first class. RCW 41.20.120 provides;
“Sick benefits. Whenever any member of the police department, on account of sickness or disability, suffered or sustained while a member of the department, and not caused or brought on by dissipation or abuse, of which the board shall be judge, is confined to any hospital or to his home and requires nursing, care, or attention, the board shall pay the necessary hospital, care, and nursing expenses of such member out of the fund, and the salary of such member shall…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lewis v. BishopWashington Supreme Court · 1898
- Carleton v. Board of Police Pension Fund CommissionersWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- In Re GiffordWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Hays v. Merchants BankWashington Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re WheelerWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- O'Connor v. Washington Law Enforcement Officers' & Fire Fighters' Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Grays Harbor County v. WilliamsonWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- Grays Harbor County v. WilliamsonWashington Supreme Court · 1981