Legal Opinion · Dissent

Grays Harbor County v. Williamson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1981No. 47292-1Published

1Dissent

*155Dore, J.

(dissenting) — The majority avoids reaching the merits of the controversy by holding that the writ of certiorari failed to vest jurisdiction with the superior court. I would uphold the court's jurisdiction and affirm the Superior Court.

Writ of Certiorari Can Challenge Legality of an Arbitrator's Award

RCW 7.16.040 provides that a writ of review (certiorari)

shall be granted by any court . . . when an inferior tribunal, board or officer, exercising judicial functions, has exceeded the jurisdiction of such tribunal, board or officer . . . or to correct any erroneous or void proceeding, or…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Detroit Coil Company v. International Association of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers, Lodge 82Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
  2. Northern State Construction Co. v. BancheroWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Standow v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Francisco v. Board of Directors of Bellevue Public Schools, District No. 405Washington Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Campbell v. Farmers Ins. Exch.California Court of Appeal · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API