Legal Opinion

United States v. Joyner

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 10, 2000No. Docket Nos. 96-1198, 96-1720, 96-1721, 97-1069, 97-1292, 98-1176, 98-1177PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINTER, Chief Judge:

From 1989 to 1995, Archie Joyner operated a drug trafficking ring in Bingham-ton, New York. Forty-one individuals, including appellants Teddy T. Atkinson, Jesse M. Carter, Carlos Charles, Raymond A. Collins, William Willoghby, Michael Barrett, and Craig Sweat, were indicted for offenses arising out of the ring. Atkinson, Carter, Charles, Collins, Barrett, and Sweat pleaded not guilty. After an eight week jury trial before Chief Judge McA-voy, in which Joyner was the government’s key witness, the jury convicted: (i) Atkinson of engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. United States v. YousefCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  2. United States v. Gurmeet Singh DhinsaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  3. United States v. YousefCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. Thomas Zichettello, Frank Richardone, Ronald Reale, Richard Hartman, James J. Lysaght, and Peter KramerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API