Legal Opinion

United States v. Currington

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 24, 1978No. 77 Cr. 721PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

KEVIN THOMAS DUFFY, District Judge.

Defendants Robert Currington and Frank Townsend, indicted in two counts alleging possession of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 812, 841(a)(1) and .841(b)(1)(A), have moved under Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(e) to suppress evidence found in Townsend’s car and apartment and in Currington’s apartment. Primarily, they claim that police officers lacked sufficient probable cause to stop and search Townsend’s car and that, as a result, all evidence ultimately derived from that search must be suppressed as “fruit of the poisonous tree.” After having heard…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. George OchsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  2. United States v. RojasDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1987
  3. United States v. CurringtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  4. United States v. George OchsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API